They help extend enforcement capabilities for more emergent issues while changing driver behavior to make work zones safer.īehind the Lens: Introduction to the Technology
These programs are not designed to replace traditional enforcement methods relating to traffic violators. Washington, Illinois, and Maryland have implemented legislation that allows for the use of speed-enforcement cameras in work zones and have seen a measurable impact on speed violations. Some states have implemented automated enforcement program, such as work zone cameras. It is an ongoing challenge to increase awareness and accountability among motorists when it comes to distracted driving and speeding. In 2014, there were 669 fatalities due to work zone crashes.
In 2015, there were an estimated 96,626 crashes in active work zones across the U.S. Add to the mix distracted drivers, speeders, and inclement weather, and the existing dangers become more risky for everyone on the road. They change normal traffic patterns and place people on or near the roadway-factors that too few drivers anticipate. Read on to learn more about the technology, legislation, and why some groups oppose their use. Pennsylvania needs to learn from other states and use realistic speed limits, the zipper merge, more night work, protective barriers, etc.Ī real state trooper can immediately prevent a safety problem, but how does a ticket a month later do that? A real trooper can also issue a ticket to a foreign driver.Work zone cameras are becoming increasingly widespread, and are commonly used for citing speeding motorists. The speed-camera law must be repealed immediately, not made worse. No profit in that.Īlso no mention of some people driving like turtles, or slamming the brakes, which may cause a crash. Engineering analysis and improvements are missing. Why was it not asked why the speed limits are underposted? Why do other states post higher speed limits in work zones? Why do they not want speed cameras there? What assurance is there of speed reading accuracy and identification of the proper vehicle?Īll I see is the desire to implement even more draconian measures to rake in more cash for the state. Are speedometers and the cameras that accurate? Recent data clearly showed most people obeying speed limits in work zones, and speeding was counted as a mere 1 mph above the speed limit, which is absurd. “Drivers urged to slow down” ( Reading Eagle, April 7) missed many key points about speed cameras in work zones and mainly spoke to people inside the revenue stream.
0 kommentar(er)
